Jump to content

Talk:German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

}}


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2020 and 8 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jschmaltz012, Ka4gb.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[Untitled]

[edit]

Today, the translation of the name by the Leopoldina itself is "German Academy of Sciences Leopoldina". Plehn 08:35, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was No consensus to move. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 11:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest to move this page to the name Leopoldina. In 2007, the German government has decided to grant the Leopoldina the rights of a National Academy of Sciences of Germany and I think it would be better to use the lemma "Leopoldina" for the academy and place a link at the top of the page to the Brasilian city. Axt (talk) 18:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps there should be a discussion of pros and cons, before people say "oppose" or "support". Actually, why don't I start. Leopoldina is to be preferred because:

Axt (talk) 22:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To respond to your points:
  1. The name Leopoldina can be used to refer to the academy, but it also has many other meanings. Performing a Google News Archive 2007 search for English-language occurrences of this name results in ~200 hits, most of which are for the Brazilian energy company Cataguazes-Leopoldina. Leaving these out, we have ~20 hits which are for neighborhoods called Vila Leopoldina in São Paulo, ~11 for royalty named Leopoldina, most of which are for Maria Leopoldina of Austria, ~13 for this academy, and ~60 for other miscellaneous usages, including the city in Minas Gerais, a suburb of Rio de Janeiro, and the hospital in Schweinfurt. So, there is no real majority for the subject of this article. Also, even in the hits for the academy, the word Leopoldina generally appears only as part of a longer name (e.g., German Academy of Sciences, Leopoldina, or something of this sort.) Leopoldina by itself only appears a couple of times.
  2. Redirects can be created to the article from alternate names regardless of the name the article is under. This has no bearing on what the article should be named.
  3. The name of the asteroid is also not relevant.
Spacepotato (talk) 23:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This may not be relevant either, but in the German press it is frequently just called Leopoldina. The small number of google hits is probably because it has just been declared the national academy of Germany some months ago and the process is still on-going and not completed. Of course there will be more hits for the British Royal Society, because it had its function for much longer. Give it some time and many more google hits will appear, probably outnumbering the others for Brazilian cities and Austrian Royalty exponentially. Axt (talk) 08:04, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with your comment on the German press. When I do the 2007 Google News Archive search in German instead of English, I get ~150 hits, the overwhelming majority of which are the academy (there are a few for the hospital and miscellaneous other usages), and the academy is often just called Leopoldina, although Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina is also popular. Still, as this is en.wikipedia, I think we have to be guided by English-language usage. If the world press falls in love with the new Leopoldina, we can always move it later. Spacepotato (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'm glad you checked google news Germany and agree with me there. I think there just aren't many hits on the English google news, because this academy has only been granted national status plus widened its scope from natural sciences to all sciences (including humanities etc.) in November 2007. Before that it was probably much less known even in Germany, let alone abroad. This might explain the lack of news articles about it that you mentioned above. Give it a year or two and there will be more, it's just a question of do we really want to wait that long. Axt (talk) 10:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PS: I don't insist on changing the name, I just think it's easier to use the short version just like they do (except for headings) on their webpage themselves. My ~former university is called Ernst Moritz Arndt University of Greifswald, but there too no-one really calls it by its full name in real life unless it's an official letterhead or something. Axt (talk) 10:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vote

[edit]

Oppose. Not its full name. Leopoldina by itself is no more likely to refer to this society than anything else. Spacepotato (talk) 21:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support. doesn't need to be the full name, but the one that is in frequent use and easy. Axt (talk) 10:49, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus, as shown at Talk:Leopoldina#Requested nove

German Academy of Sciences Leopoldina → Leopoldina — See Talk:Leopoldina for discussion —Axt (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

===Survey===

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion

[edit]
Any additional comments:
This issue is being discussed at Talk:Leopoldina. There is no reason to have a separate discussion here. Spacepotato (talk) 19:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I agree with you. Someone has notified me on my talkpage that my proposal is "incomplete" -- so I thought this might be the necessary thing to do. But I agree with you, we need only one place to discuss this and that is Talk:Leopoldina -- Axt (talk) 19:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Member vs. Fellow

[edit]

The difference between "Members" and "Fellows" of the Leopoldina seems to be mixed up in this article: "Leopoldina Fellows" are the recipients of a (postdoctoral) fellowship sponsored by the Leopoldina (http://www.leopoldina-halle.de/cms/en/academy/fellowship-programme.html), while the actual members of the academy are referred to as "Leopoldina Members" (http://www.leopoldina-halle.de/cms/en/academy/organisation/members.html). This may be changed/clarified here and in the category "Fellows_of_the_Leopoldina" (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Fellows_of_the_Leopoldina) (which, by the way, may be linked from this article). 24.34.207.168 (talk) 13:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spurious Claim

[edit]

The following claim is made: 'In 1670 the society began to publish the Ephemeriden, the world's first medical and scientific journal.' This date is indeed correct for the journal, as recorded in this article in German: de:Miscellanea Curiosa which is about the same journal (under a different name); unfortunately no English version exists. This makes it five years after the Journal des sçavans/Savants and Philosophical Transactions, hence the claim 'world's first medical and scientific journal' does not stand.

What would be correct is something like 'In 1670 the society began to publish the Ephermeriden or Miscellanea Curiosa (article in German), one of the earliest scientific journals and one which had a particularly strong focus on medicine and related aspects of natural philosophy, such as botany and physiology'. It may even make the claim that it is the world's first medical or medical science journal, but not the world's first science and medicine journal. I have a COI on this subject as indicated in my signature, so it would be best if someone else were to make this change if agreed (Sjanusz|talk)(COI) 15:00, 14 April 2014 (UTC) I will leave this here (and try to find a third party with whom I have no COI who is happy to edit) for another week or so. If I am unsuccessful, I'll make the edit. (Sjanusz|talk)(COI) 16:28, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Academy of Sciences Leopoldina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Academy of Sciences Leopoldina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Changes

[edit]

Re-working the summary paragraph to include a little about when they started and different names they've had over the years. Jschmaltz012 (talk) 17:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed changes

[edit]

Adding facts about how old the academy is and a little about what their research focused on. Ka4gb (talk) 17:44, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Changes

[edit]

Giving the history section more depth(to include more of its early years and war time era) and adding to the list of members. Additionally, I renamed the presidents section 'Leadership' and discussed the presidents as well as the senate and sections of the academy. Jschmaltz012 (talk) 17:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

[edit]

Adding more information to the history section about the records of the Academy and the timeline. Ka4gb (talk) 23:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:German_National_Academy_of_Sciences_Leopoldina&oldid=1202265770"