Talk:General Maximum

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

How is the subject of this article any different from that of http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Maximum_Price_Act ? Should these 2 articles be merged? 75.5.3.28 (talk) 05:07, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Robespierre's role

This article places a huge responsibility for the law with Maximilien Robespierre, who in reality had relatively little to do with it. Also, claims like "Robespierre had business interests in the law" are unsubstantiated. I'm going to rework this in the next few days if nobody objects. Ebolamunkee (talk) 21:55, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Subject is the same: so, there is need to merge. This article is more detailed, but the interwikis are found in the other. About naming: if we consider the merged article to concentrate more on economy, the title of this page is better. If on law - the other article's title matches.89.191.112.246 (talk) 01:55, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]