Talk:Gambler (song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   After two weeks, it peaked at four on the chart, and was present for fourteen weeks on the chart. "chart" - "chart" can we lose one of these to improve the flow?  Done

   ... with her tummy-button exposed ... Would "navel" be more encyclopaedic here?  Done

   Corrected. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 16:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All online sources are live, all online sources support the statements, I assume good faith for the books. All references are to reliable sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The artcile covers the song in sufficient detail.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   One image used with appropriate non-free use rationale. I noticed that there is no image caption, but that infobox template doesn't support that feature.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   OK, on hold for seven days. Just a couple of minor issues to address. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

   OK, I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. Congratulations! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)