Talk:GMF AeroAsia
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on GMF AeroAsia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070606193111/http://www.gmf-aeroasia.co.id:80/index.php?map=1.4 to http://www.gmf-aeroasia.co.id/index.php?map=1.4
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:GMF AeroAsia/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Referencing and citation: criterion not met
Its references are wereupdated in 2004, not recent. It needs new cites. Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met I feel that it needs more information on its history and services. Structure: criterion met It has a lead section summarizing the subject and has sections. Grammar: criterion met Its grammer is good. Supporting materials: criterion not metIt has no pictures or graphs. |
Last edited at 20:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 15:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)