Talk:Geospatial intelligence

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force

Espionage High‑importance

	Geospatial intelligence is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

GEOINT data sources

This statement, "comprising the exploitation and analysis of satellite information", does not make sense. How can you state GEOINT IS from satellite information and the next sentence say the source can be collected from aircraft or by other means? The word satellite should be removed as it directly contradicts the second sentence, nor does it reflect the vision of the founding father of GEOINT (LTG (ret.) James R. Clapper, who frequently preached that GEOINT is from any source (and he meant any source, whether a human, aircraft, or satellite collected it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.33.3 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 1 November 2006

If you think it should read differently, then be bold and change it! Especially if you know something about the topic. LobStoR (talk) 02:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The second sentence in the definition of GEOINT reads, "GEOINT sources include imagery and mapping data, whether collected by commercial satellite, government satellite or by other means, such as UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) or reconissance aircraft." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.33.3 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 1 November 2006

I have the same response as above... be bold. LobStoR (talk) 02:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

US Army definition

US ARMY Defines GEOINT as: Intelligence derived from the exploitation, analysis, and fusion of imagery with geospatial information to describe, assess, and visually depict physical features and geographically referenced activities in the battlespace. GEOINT consists of imagery, imagery intelligence (IMINT) and geospatial information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.27.1.2 (talk • contribs) 12:51, 11 January 2007

Unreferenced

No footnotes or citations, just a list of external links. Tagged added. momo ricks 00:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Geospatial intelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geospatial intelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Article seems too large and stands up on It's own to merge with GIS in geospatial intelligence article in my opinion, and I would suggest removing merger tag from up top, with a link being sufficient. --JLavigne508 (talk) 18:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]