Jump to content

Talk:Fringe season 3/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 22:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review. TBrandley • talk • contributions 22:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tick box

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

[edit]
  • Lede: well-received by critics → well received by television critics - Per MOS:TV and MOS:
  • Ratings and broadcast: CSI: New York → CSI: NY
  • Reviews: Film aggregate review site Metacritic gave the third season 77/100 → Film aggregate review site Metacritic gave the third season 77 out of 100
  • References: Ref. 83 - TV By the Numbers → TV by the Numbers
I will try to fix the above issues, or somebody else. However, other than above, I can see this going to FA status, please also nominate for FA, or a peer review, first. TBrandley • talk • contributions 23:10, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted. TBrandley • talk • contributions 23:15, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]