Jump to content

Talk:Frank S. Scott

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeFrank S. Scott was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 11, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 28, 2019.

Failed GA Status

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Frank S. Scott/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I failed this article because it largely lacks citation in certain areas, and it could be better worded in certain areas. The man is definitely notable, but the article, I feel, is not really long enough to be a biographical good article. Diez2 21:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Add maintenance category

[edit]

Per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 March 21#Category:Missing middle or first names, Category:Missing middle or first names has been added to this talk page.DomBot / ChiDom talk 09:09, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Frank S. Scott/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

While it may be persumptious for me to rate an article that I have solely worked on, I feel that a "B"-class rating fulfills WPBiography's rating qualifications. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 17:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 15:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)