Talk:Final Fantasy XIV/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:24, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Will be happy to review. JAGUAR 16:24, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]- " for Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X, Sony PlayStation 3, and PlayStation 4" - no need for "Sony"
- Done.
- "and the first 24-man raid, Crystal Tower" - I don't know what this means
- I added a wikilink to raid (gaming) and reworded it slightly. Is it more clear?
- Got it, thanks JAGUAR 14:50, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- I added a wikilink to raid (gaming) and reworded it slightly. Is it more clear?
- "Regardless of server or language, the game features a large library of automatically translated game terms and general phrases which allow players who speak different languages to communicate" - this sentence needs a citation. I didn't see anything about automatic translation in ref 6
- Done.
- "Upon reaching the level cap, currently 60" - is 'currently 60' still acceptable now? Does the game get regularly updated to introduce new ranks?
- Removed.
- "These Jobs, based on classic Final Fantasy character jobs" - does 'jobs' need to be capitalized in this instance?
- Done.
- "When the fourth and final beta phase started on August 17" - of which year?
- Done.
- PlayStation 4 linked twice in Testing and release
- Done.
- I'd unlink RPGFan in Reception
- Done.
- Ref 41 is dead
- Refs 88 and 89 need to be filled out
- I had forgotten to reformat the refs. This should be done now.
Overall an excellent and comprehensive article. Once all of the minor issues are out of the way then this would have no problem passing. JAGUAR 22:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- I think I've addressed your above concerns. Axem Titanium (talk) 09:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. With all of the issues out of the way, this should be good to go.
JAGUAR 14:50, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! Axem Titanium (talk) 15:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. With all of the issues out of the way, this should be good to go.