Jump to content

Talk:Fijación Oral, Vol. 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Fijación Oral Vol. 1)
Featured articleFijación Oral, Vol. 1 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 31, 2014.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 15, 2013Good article nomineeListed
August 24, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
October 7, 2013Featured article candidatePromoted
June 16, 2024Good topic candidateNot promoted
Current status: Featured article

Improvement Ideas

[edit]

I would like too see one Shakira article get a Good Article tag. Fijacion Oral would be a good place to start. We can start by improving the critical reviews section, making a separate commercial reception section, a promotion section that talks about the singles and their chart performance along with a brief paragraph or two about the Oral Fixation Tour. Also, we need to find more information regarding the recording, collaborations, compositions of the songs, etc. to help improve the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.109.147.18 (talk) 06:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

I thought the album's name is Fijacion Oral Vol. 1??

singles

[edit]

Neither Obtener Un Si or Las De la Intuition have charted on the billboard hot latin tracks. Nor have No and Dia De Enero on the Billboard hot 100

http://billboard.com/bbcom/retrieve_chart_history.do?model.vnuArtistId=147604&model.vnuAlbumId=683532 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&searchlink=SHAKIRA&sql=11:mflvadokt8wj~T51

24.23.228.148 02:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to Billboard the following songs charted on the following charts:

Dia Especial - Latin Pop Songs (#26)[1] Las de la Intuicion - Latin Pop Songs (#16) and Latin Songs (#32) [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.109.147.18 (talk) 06:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

Notes

[edit]

From Billboard: [3] Erick (talk) 19:39, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Fijación Oral, Vol. 1/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Maine12329 (talk · contribs) 09:04, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

A few issues with the references but article is overall well written
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Replacable primary sources.
    Should metrolyrics really be the reference 15 in the 3rd and 4th paragraphs?
    reference 15 could be improved. (billboard.biz is defunct) reference 21 does not state the director's name.
Ref 15 leads to a archived version of the site which is perfectly acceptable if no substitute can be found. See WP:LINKROT. Erick (talk) 19:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  4. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  5. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I think that section 2's references can be easily improved. No major issues with the article
regarding that archived reference, I've left a comment on Wikipedia talk:Using the Wayback Machine because I just find it strange that a subscription-only chart is archived and may result in copyright violations. It's not a problem with this Shakira article then. I had thought that perhaps the usual citing of Billboard [4] would suffice but apparently their chart archives for Latin Songs Year-End don't date back to 2005. ⊾maine12329⊿ talkswiki 01:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Before the website relaunched earlier this year, it had posted Year-end charts up till 2002. The others could be found by searching Billboard magazines on Google Books. Now, only Google Books can be used for earlier years and some of the issues are missing which contain year-end charts. Erick (talk) 05:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Don't want to interrupt but it seems the article has passed. If so, then one should certainly change the talk page and do all that icon and listing stuff. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Quick comments

[edit]

These are just brief comments so I didn't include them in the PR:

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fijación Oral, Vol. 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fijación Oral, Vol. 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fijación Oral, Vol. 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fijación Oral, Vol. 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]