Talk:Form 4473

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

e4473

Coloseum Software ( http://www.coloseumsoftware.com/ ) also provides an e4473 application that is approved by the ATF, although there is some controversy regarding intellectual property issues regarding the ATF software. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.150.194.249 (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History?

When was the form instituted? Other relevant events?

Re Biden case - if it’s deemed necessary to keep it here

It should be made clear in regards to the rarity of prosecutions of people lying on the form and that it is typically only if felonies occur- the document that has been said to support this- found here https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-18-440.pdf - seems to only apply to those who lied AND were denied purchase approval…. I haven't gone through the 80 off pages of it but the highlights at the beginning certainly make it look like it applies to that specific combo…. Someone more familiar and knowledgeable with the material and with hunter Biden's case could hopefully take a look into it , especially since Google ai generates the same rarity of prosecution and it also omits the seemingly important qualifier of it applying to cases of applicants who lied and also were denied…

Cheers Ramahamalincoln (talk) 09:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]