Talk:Northrop F-20 Tigershark

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Northrop F-20 Tigershark article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Northrop F-20 Tigershark has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 22, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
August 16, 2008	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
August 6, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 4, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that due to shifting political winds, the production of the F-20 Tigershark (pictured) for the Taiwanese Air Force failed to start on three separate occasions?
Current status: Good article

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Engine thrust

F404-GE100 does not have 79 kN of thrust, it has about 73 kN of thrust. 79 kN is for much newer, much more advanced F404-GE402 version of engine, which is only used in late classic Hornets (mostly ones sold to Switzerland, Finland, and small amount of last planes that went to USMC.

I tried to fix this but somebody reverted my edit saying I need to have a reference to this - even though there is no reference in the original, wrong thrust number. -- Hkultala (talk) 06:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hkultala: I reverted your change, as you didn't cite a reliable, published source. That's not optional. There are three sources cited in the specs section, so the figure is presumably from one of those. I don't have any of the three cited sources, but I have a couple of other print sources, and they state 17,000 lbf., not the current 17,700. I recall reading years ago that GE based the uprated Hornet engines on the work they had done for single engine models of the F404, including for the F-20, which had slightly more thrust than the Hornet engines. I'll try to update it within a few days using one of those sources. BilCat (talk) 07:50, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was suspicious that it had originally stated "17,000", so I checked the article's history. In this diff, it was changed to "17,000" when the specs template was updated. The user who made the apparent typo is no longer on Wikipedia, as he was prone to such errors and eventually blocked from editing articles. Sigh. BilCat (talk) 08:02, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.icas.org/ICAS_ARCHIVE/ICAS1984/ICAS-84-5.4.2.pdf

This looks like a good source.

So it looks like you are correct, the version in F-20 is slightly improved version with 17000 lbs of thrust. More than I thought, but less than what was in the article before you updated it.

--Hkultala (talk) 16:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AIM-120 AMRAAM

None of the sources in technical section mention AIM-120 AMRAAMs, so it should be removed. I have just read them as they relate to the tigershark and remove them as unsourced. Fred Walker (talk) 12:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Harpoons also not mentioned in any of the sources, same treatment Fred Walker (talk) 12:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]