Talk:Etching

PCB etching

I Suggest adding a section on Printed Circuit Board Etching and other modern industrial processes --Mike134 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.156.10.80 (talk) 14:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photolithography --195.137.93.171 (talk) 22:57, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, what exactly IS etching?

and what is "relief etching" (as used by William Blake) 219.90.130.120 02:34, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

quite so! - this page is a mess & this whole area is badly covered. There are better accounts in printmaking & aquatint, although they do not cover relief etching & I am trying to improve several pages in this area. Johnbod 12:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i've now added to it a bit, but this still needs work. The drypoint picture is nice, but drypoint is NOT an etching technique but an engraving one. should go. Johnbod 13:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Vernis mou" vs "Vernis mous

The correct spelling for the technique is "vernis mou", as it is the non-plural form in French. This is also the most common form in English and in German alike. Ref [1]. Google gives 780 results for "vernis mous" and 20 000 results for "vernis mou". Thanks, Hugo Dufort 10:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- well actually switch Google to English language pages only & you get 273 for vernis-mou, & 34 for vernis-mous - most pages in fact not in English for either, but vernis-mou seems well ahead. "soft-ground etching" is of course the proper English term - 75,000 mentions Johnbod 10:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New disambiguation page - Proposal to revert to previous situation

User:Smack has taken it upon it himself (20 December 06) to put etching to a new disambiguation page. This was done without any consultation & I think this is a mistake, and the previous situation should be reverted to, for the following reasons:

there was only one page called etching.
it implies that what he calls etching (art) is not chemical etching, which is not the case.
the only other item on the new page, Line art, is a mish-mash of a page & does not mention etching once in the main text, and has very little to do with etching. He describes it as "an improper use" himself.
there was a perfectly adequate disam notice at the top of the etching article already, pointing to chemical etching:

This page discusses etching in connection with printing and art. For other industrial uses of etching see Chemical etching.

For the history of etching, see old master prints.

In the United States, the term etching is sometimes used improperly to refer to line drawings done in pen and ink and other media.

this will leave hundreds of "etching" and "etcher" references pointing here, which will take forever to sort out, & cause continuing confusion, hassle, and inefficient linkage.
there was no proposal to do this.

Please say if you Support or Oppose at the Talk:Etching page, Thanks! Johnbod 21:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Aquatinta landscape.jpg

Image:Aquatinta landscape.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:42, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Vernis-mous landscape.jpg

Image:Vernis-mous landscape.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relief etching

A thorough description of the Relief etching technique and process, is required on the Variants: aquatint, soft-ground and relief etching section of the article. There are two other articles with longer descriptions: William Blake and All Religions are One articles.

— RW Marloe (talk) 14:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a link to the second of these - thanks for that - and some text. However as Blake was almost the only person to use his technique (whatever that was), I don't think a full description is needed here. Johnbod (talk) 03:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Etching. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120825165930/http://www.chicagoartistsresource.org:80/node/9287 to http://www.chicagoartistsresource.org/node/9287

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:44, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A new image for the page

I made a visualization about the process of etching, focusing on the tools used and how the metal plate is modified by them. The image refers to the section of "Modern technique in detail". CarolaBa (talk) 00:05, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - added. Nice, though I wasn't too sure the test strip box was clear. Johnbod (talk) 05:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Etching. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150906124255/http://www.cairnsregionalgallery.com.au:80/ed-artiststudio.pdf to http://www.cairnsregionalgallery.com.au/ed-artiststudio.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:57, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]