Talk:Electrical safety testing

Occupational Safety and Health High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electrical engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electrical safety comprises issues such as fire hazards and arc flash outside of electrical shock. Perhaps an article on electrical safety in general is needed.Ccrrccrr (talk) 23:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at writing an article on electrical safety testing for medical equipment. Does anyone have any issues with that being part of the current article, since there will be many similarities between the two? 8 August 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerobot (talk • contribs) 08:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electrical safety testing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140108051830/http://www.nnskeuringen.nl:80/_nen/nen3140.php to http://nnskeuringen.nl/_nen/nen3140.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Competent Person"

The term "competent person" is used but not defined; a reader might interpret it too loosely. I will not describe it myself, as my knowledge of world-wide practice is insufficient.

For an example, see

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Electrical_wiring_in_the_United_Kingdom

94.30.84.71 (talk) 16:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly, the US NFPA 70E on Electrical Safety in the Workplace 2021 edition, defines "Qualified Person" and adds this definion correlates with the US OSHA definition.

"One who has demonstrated skills and knowledge related to the construction and operation of electrical equipment and installations and has received safety training to identify the hazards and reduce the associated risk."

Does this help? Dougp01 (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge due to silent consensus. Alan Islas (talk) 10:40, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging MOP (electrical safety), MOOP (electrical safety) and MOPP (electrical safety) into Electrical safety testing. I think the contents do not warrant stand-alone articles, and can be explained in the context of Electrical safety testing, and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Electrical safety testing. @NoJoshua: notifying page creator. (Started discussions on the source pages by error, apologies for multiple pinging). Alan Islas (talk) 20:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.