Talk:Edward Davenport (fraudster)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Edward Davenport (fraudster) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 150 days ![]() |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Edward Davenport (fraudster). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Edward Davenport (fraudster) at the Reference desk. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 150 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Response
[edit]I found actual reference to the court case itself (chancery division) which deals with issues of equity and commercial property. Lord Davenport paid £800,000 to settle the case. The Sierra Leone government dropped the case following legal advice from their counsel. There is no mention of fraud. http://www.christian-monitor.org/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=328&Itemid=42
I will source out the original court case transcript if you wish.
I accept that the Bilderberg affiliation is possibly too ambiguous to publish as an encyclopaedic form of information. For this reason I will not dispute it being removed.
I will remove the "self-proclaimed" aristocrat or indeed any mention of aristocrat if it suits you, until you verify this fact with the College of Arms as discussed above.
As a recent Wiki user/editor points out - citations are needed. Wikipedia policy on the subject of living persons require that this be deleted until a credible source can be found, especially where such statements are defamatory or give rise to libel.
The royal bet should be mentioned; however I disagree with your opinion or any other wikipedia users opinion. Instead facts should be represented.
I have never claimed that Lord Edward Davenport was admitted to the Sunday Times rich list. He did however, enter the Mail on Sunday Rich Report which is mentioned in the same BBC transcript and can be verified by the Mail on Sunday. This fact should be mentioned, although it might be worthwhile mentioning that he was declined entry to the Sunday Times Rich List.
Is this a suitable starting point?
Religion
[edit]There seems to be some debate about the addition of an entire section regarding Davenport's religious beliefs. I agree that this section is unnecessary, for two main reasons. First, the DAILYMAIL is no longer considered a reliable source for most things. Second, it puts UNDUE focus on his religion. A sentence or two, maybe, would be fine, but not a full section with quotes. Primefac (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Edward Davenport (fraudster). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140729183548/http://www.ukroots.com/getperson.php?personID=I10196&tree=Tree to http://www.ukroots.com/getperson.php?personID=I10196&tree=Tree
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111223051914/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23916250-its-enough-to-make-king-george-speechless-set-for-firths-hit-film-was-a-sex-party-venue.do to http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23916250-its-enough-to-make-king-george-speechless-set-for-firths-hit-film-was-a-sex-party-venue.do
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007200224/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/lifestyle/article-23854050-the-real-fast-eddie-davenport.do to http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/lifestyle/article-23854050-the-real-fast-eddie-davenport.do
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111109210123/http://www.sfo.gov.uk/press-room/latest-press-releases/press-releases-2011/edward-davenport-and-five-others-convicted-in-gresham-advanced-fee-fraud.aspx to http://www.sfo.gov.uk/press-room/latest-press-releases/press-releases-2011/edward-davenport-and-five-others-convicted-in-gresham-advanced-fee-fraud.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Edward Davenport (fraudster). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007155734/http://www.davenporttrust.com/press_area.html to http://www.davenporttrust.com/press_area.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Mayfair
[edit]Davenport might have been behind the alleged party in Mayfair in London at which Simionov was stabbed to death on 1/1/2019. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.195.236 (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles