Jump to content

Talk:Eddy Current Suppression Ring

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Two Questions

[edit]

Should it not be Eddy Current Suppression Ring are a band, not is?

Whether it's a group or a band, either is a singular entity describing a number of individuals, so I think it's "is". If it was "the members of", then "are" would be correct I believe. Murtoa (talk) 12:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although I disagree with your view, I accept it for the purposes of this article. You might however wish to consult a number of wikipedia articles on bands which have been declared 'feature-article' standard. You will see that the grammar varies between your and my view, although mine would appear to be more prominent. This should be sufficient to stop you reverting my corrections of other articles, which you may have noticed were substantially poorer in quality prior to my edit. Protea Ave (talk) 11:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My 2c worth: it may be an Australian English thing. I've had the belief (maybe incorrectly) that bands/groups/ensembles are treated as noun plurals. For most of the Australian band articles that I've started I use the phrase "XXXX are an Australian..." or similar, rather than "XXXX is an Australian..."shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 09:15, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does one good review constitute "critical acclaim"? Protea Ave (talk) 10:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was a critic and it was acclaim, but yes it was just one review. So I've added this one Murtoa (talk) 12:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've added two reivews from AllMusic (one on the band, another on the album), which both acclaim this album.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 09:15, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Eddy Current Suppression Ring. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Eddy Current Suppression Ring/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

C-class: reasonable info & infobox supplied (more record labels available from article); has some: in-line refs but needs more (current ones fixed too e.g. for first ref, add in: last=Donovan |first=Patrick | publisher=The Age then do similar for others where applicable), wikify "Singles titles"; (aside: are Eddy and Danny actually brothers or is it just the band name thing?), expanded discussion (short sentence paragraphs can be combined); and sectns (including a summarising Lead) could bring it to B-class;Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:03, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:03, 9 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eddy Current Suppression Ring. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Eddy_Current_Suppression_Ring&oldid=1196406008"