Talk:EXL Service

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Added Gurgaon as the Inductis analytics location.

Removed the 15-20% attrition rate - its a mere speculation with no data, and is incorrect as well. No firm can survive for more then 5 months with such high attritions.

And yes, added Inductis website as well 203.123.175.11 09:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Partial duplication of content between two sections

As part of a major reorganization/revision of the article, I've taken a split approach to acquisitions. "Technical" details of acquisitions appear in the Acquisitions section while "strategic" details (why and what impact on business) are included in the Corporate history and business model section. I'm hoping as more citations are added to the Acquisitions section that commensurate strategic information can be added to the Corp Hist/Bus model section. Thanks for thinking about this and adding as you can. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]