Talk:Durance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Durance from fr.wikipedia. |
References
[edit]Looks like we're treading on each other's toes here.
I've reverted your changes references. Doing it the way you do, you lose the page numbers.
A common way to do it is simply refer to the book then the Notes just give the page numbers. So the ref just says [1] then ONE reference to the book in ==References== section,
- ^ Cléber, p.39
then goes into Notes section. I don't know if you've seen that before. It's not perfect I admit, but I've restored for now since I don't want to lose all the page numbers until it's been discussed. SimonTrew (talk) 11:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, there were dozens of other changes made. It might be better to start with my version and then add specific page numbers by viewing the older versions. I changed the punctuation of several footnote titles, many translations from French, and the layout of text sections, beyond just combining the footnotes with similar page numbers. Typically, if a footnote can identify 3 book-pages to check, that is close enough. When a source is a webpage, that webpage could be the equivalent of 15 (or more) book-pages. Hence, listing 3 pages in a footnote is a big improvement over citing a large webpage as the source. -Wikid77 (talk) 11:32, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have quickly merged the 2 versions, combining all new translations, because I had revised translations all the way to the end (of the article) and into fixing the footnote titles, plus correcting the Latin terms & punctuation & other typos. At this point, I will allow you to continue translations & re-add some particular footnote page numbers (if you think they are critical to sourcing). -Wikid77 (talk) 12:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Massive nightmare re-translation
[edit]01-May-09: The article "Durance" was vastly expanded, in June 2008, with a rough translation text from the French Wikipedia article. Much of the text was auto-translated into "Yoda-speak" (meaning "proper word order often it doesn't" ). In late April 2009, re-translation continued, but there were numerous issues to consider:
- some marked phrases are unusual:
- "catchment" was replaced sometimes as "drainage area";
- "installments" is a strange word & perhaps refers to towns or bridges;
- "affluents" has been replaced a few times with river "branches";
- some of the ref-tag source footnotes have bad punctuation.
- all 60 ref-tag footnotes were edited to end with periods ".</ref>".
- about 65 page-number abbreviations "p" were dotted as "p."
- many footnotes were close duplicates of others and have been combined.
Only the top 30% of the article seems logically translated, the bottom 2/3rds still contains some very bizarre, awkward wording.
The semi-translation (in June 2008) expanded the article from a mere 1kb to over 44kb (44,000 characters) of data. As a result, the re-translation has been a long-term nightmare, of garbled text with random spacing and half-worded footnotes, being unscrambled by several people during the previous year. -Wikid77 (talk) 11:32, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Strange Text in Formations of islands in the river bed
[edit]Some of the text in this section looks very odd. "stuffed them, of the accumulations of trunks and wood flottés" I thought it was hacking, but it goes back a very long way, to 2008. My French is not up to checking against the original. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cerddaf (talk • contribs) 21:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Economic
[edit]The economic section doesn't contain information on the rivers effect on the economy therefore it should be deleted and merged.TheHappiestCritic (talk) 04:35, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Merged Economic section. TheHappiestCritic (talk) 04:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Durance/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Has a lot of content machine translated, now needs finishing translating.Tom (talk) 01:18, 29 June 2008 (UTC) Can't believe this is start class. It is literally worse than useless. SimonTrew (talk) 11:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC) |
Last edited at 11:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 13:55, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Durance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://publications.ecologie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Rapport-Durance-Prempart.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080616084142/http://www.geographie-geomatique.ac-aix-marseille.fr/banque_photos/banque_photos.html to http://www.geographie-geomatique.ac-aix-marseille.fr/banque_photos/banque_photos.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090330074326/http://www.geographie-geomatique.ac-aix-marseille.fr/durance/index.html to http://www.geographie-geomatique.ac-aix-marseille.fr/durance/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080330031310/http://natura2000.environnement.gouv.fr/sites/FR9301589.html to http://natura2000.environnement.gouv.fr/sites/FR9301589.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)