Talk:Drowned God/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 05:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):
b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Infobox

Information in body of article needed to support that it was released on "Windows 95" platform
Source needed to verify ratings of "ELSPA" and "USK"

Lead

No issues

Story

Wiki-link "Dystopian"

Gameplay

No issues

Development

Move this section to the top of the article as it will make more sense on how it was developed

Reception

If "Adventure Gamers" had no score or review, please remove it from the review scores table

References

General note: Do not italicize sources that are not publications. Please move them to the publisher section for proper formatting. Here are some examples of this:
Reference 1 → "MobyGames" is not a written publication and should not be italicized

References 2-4 → "GameSpot" should not be italicized

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 19:07, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About the development section, I'd gone back and forth on it. Normally, I've seen it below plot and gameplay sections, but I felt like it was better in front, so glad to see someone else felt the same way. I believe I have addressed all the other issues. Thanks for the review! —Torchiest ^talk_edits 19:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job on responding so quickly! Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 19:57, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]