Jump to content

Talk:Dornier Do X

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Dornier Do X/Comments)

Untitled

[edit]

I believe that the Do X was never flown or being used by Lufthansa F.bendik 11:57, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Substantial article of historical importance. Lacks references. MadMaxDog 08:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Final fate

[edit]

Germany's original Do X was turned over to Lufthansa, the national airline, after the financially strapped Dornier Company could no longer operate it. After a successful 1932 tour of German coastal cities, Lufthansa planned a Do X flight to Vienna, Budapest, and Istanbul for 1933. The voyage ended after nine days when the plane's tail section tore off during a botched, over-steep landing on a reservoir lake near the city of Passau.[1] While the fiasco was successfully covered up and the plane repaired, it was then flown to Berlin,[clarification needed] where it became the centerpiece of Germany's new aviation museum in 1934.[citation needed]

I added {{Clarify me}} and {{Fact}} tags to the above because there is no cite for Berlin nor 1934 but there are sources for flying back to Bodensee and 2 years later of a transfer to Berlin.

I'm not familiar with this part of history, I have none of the source books, so all I can make is this summary from some googled cites. It seems this needs to be clarified by someone with actual books and not from Google Books snippets.

1933 May 9 tail section lost landing on reservoir near Passau[1]
1933 remained in Heining west Passau for several weeks where it was repaired with difficulty in the open[1]
1933 September 5: Wagner flies it back to Bodensee [2]
1933 after 9 May it made a few further flights[3]
1933 dismantled in Travemünde, transported to the Deutsche Luftfahrtsammlung Berlin, a precursor to the Deutschen Technikmuseums Berlin, where it was eventually exhibited[4]
1934 in museum, but which?
1934 October taken out of service by the Reich Air Ministry (RLM = Reichsluftfahrtministerium)[3][5]
1936 transferred to the Berliner-Luftfahrt museum[6]
1936 June the DO X was the central feature in the Museum at its opening[3]
1943 November damaged by WWII bomb[4][3]
After WWII ended, destroyed by metal-scavengers and trophy-hunters[4][3]
Today only a few metal pieces and one wooden propeller remain, plus the tail section[4][3]

Citations:

  1. ^ a b c Hormann p. 9. 9. Mai 1933 im Passau Cite error: The named reference "SM" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  2. ^ Hormann p. 9 right-most column: Am 5.September 1933 flog Chefeinflieger Wagner die DO-X zum Bodensee zurück. Mit dem Fiasko von Passau begann für DO-X der Weg ins Museum. Loose translation: On 3 September 1933 chief test pilot Wagner flew the DO-X back to Bodensee. The Passau fiasco resulted in the DO-X starting its journey into the museum.
  3. ^ a b c d e f Szigeti
  4. ^ a b c d German wikipedia
  5. ^ Editors of German wikipedia state the RLM announced the end of DO X's career as a passenger aircraft in October 1934
  6. ^ Zeitschrift VLGA p. 204. 1936 wurde die Do X in das Berliner Luftfahrt-Museum überführt (translation: In 1936 the Do X was transferred to the Berliner Luftfahrt-Museum)

References:

  • Jörg-Michael Hormann (2008-05-17), Anfang vom Ende des ersten "Jumbo" (PDF) (in German), Starnberger Merkur, p. 9, retrieved 2009-05-03
  • Zeitschrift des Vereins für Lübeckische Geschichte und Altertumskunde (in German), M. Schmidt-Römhild., 2006, retrieved 2009-05-26
  • Szigeti, Marton (1999-05-10), DORNIER DO X: LEGENDARY FLYING BOAT, FLUG REVUE, Ubierstr. 83, 53173 Bonn, Germany, retrieved 2009-05-26, From page 16 of FLUG REVUE 6/99
  • Dornier Do X (in German), Editors of German Wikipedia, 2009-05-14, retrieved 2009-05-26

84user (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2009 (UTC) I added more details. 84user (talk) 21:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Passenger record for 20 years

[edit]

Presently the article says: "In order to satisfy skeptics, on its 70th test flight on October 21st there were 169 souls on board;[1] 150 passengers (mostly production workers and their families, and a few journalists), 10 aircrew and 9 "stowaways", who did not hold tickets. The flight broke the then world record for the number of persons carried on a single flight, a record that was not broken for another 15 years."

In fact, the record that was not broken for another 20 years, by the US military transporter R6V_Constitution. Epsiloner (talk) 13:21, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here a source for this claim (SPIEGEL online): http://einestages.spiegel.de/static/topicalbumbackground/4757/groessenwahn_hoch_x.html Unfortunately the article is in German, but it also has 20 nice photographs of the Do X. Epsiloner (talk) 13:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the source, I have added it as an inline citation.
The main source for the article, was a seven column whole page spread on the Do-X for the Starnberg's regional newspaper, weekend issue 17/18 May 2008, number 114. The PDF of that page, "Starnberger Merkur 17.Mai 2008 Lokales.pdf", was hosted by http://zeppelin-bis-airbus.de/ but the link now returns 404 and the site itself requires a ispCP Omega login. The Internet Archive reports the site's robots.txt prevents it keeping a copy. A copy of the PDF still remains on my PC but I will slowly replace some cites with page 16 from the English language FLUG REVUE 1999 that is still-online at http://www.flug-revue.rotor.com/FRheft/FRH9906/FR9906d.htm . -84user (talk) 15:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dornier Museum video

[edit]

I added the 5 minute 14 second video Historische Aufnahmen der Dornier Do X on YouTube as a reference for some inline citations. In case it is of interest for others here are some key points from the film.

Minutes Seconds Duration Notes
0 0 10 Dornier aircraft sketches
0 10 12 Doriner DO X specifications
0 24 6 Still photos of a possible one to one scale model
0 30 15 Still photos, start of planning, film clip of factory on Bodensee
0 45 25 240 thousand work hours, film of DO-X in water, "will it fly?", doubts
1 12 21 engineer in control room, 1929-06-12 first flight
1 33 5 Test pilot Richard Wagner
1 38 18 12 Jupiter motors, measuring air speed
1 56 5 Record: flew with 170 people on board
2 14 10 Unsatisfactory Jupiter motor performance: upgraded with more powerful water cooled Curtis motors, each 640 HP
2 25 15 cross-section diagram: 3 decks; photo cockpit; films: machine room; man crawling along tunnel (inside wing?); radio room and rotating circular antenna
2 40 15 main deck with seats for 66 people, dining tables, branded porcelain "Dekoration von Marcel Dornier Langenargen" "Gräf & Krippner Selb Bavaria"; menu with seven white wines followed by red wine list
2 57 10 passenger facilities: onboard telephone, typewriter. Upholstered furniture
3 08 3 man lies down on seat folded flat
3 12 6 fuel tanks in the underdeck 23 thousand litres capacity
3 20 26 1930-11-05 DO-X starts its Europaflug including Holland, England, France, Spain and Portugal; film clips of machine room, pilot at wheel, stranded ship
3 46 12 map of route Rio to New York, 22 days with 10 landings and "visiting" flights included
3 58 35 British Movietone title card "DO-X REACHES END OF LONG VOYAGE", behind and at Statue of Liberty with escort aircraft, landing
4 34 10 Coney Island boat Sea Gate Route, American newspaper headlines, people fascinated, film of DO-X with flags, people on wing
4 56 10 Photo of group on New York City Hall steps: mayor welcomes the crew
5 06 8 After much overhaul and over-wintering in New York, the DO-X flies back to Europe, and then to Berlin

-84user (talk) 00:59, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dornier Do X/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Substantial article of historical importance. Lacks references. MadMaxDog 08:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 08:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 13:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dornier Do X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dornier Do X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dornier Do X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"X"

[edit]

Is that the letter 'X' or the Roman Numeral 'X'? 104.153.40.58 (talk) 21:18, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The letter. It's part of letter designation series. BilCat (talk) 21:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]