Talk:Diversified Global Graphics Group

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Review Request

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can I get a second pair of eyes on this article to review and make sure I am adhering to the Wikipedia standards for submission? I think almost everything is accounted for. Backburnercomics (talk) 14:06, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would get a few more opinions, but looking at your sections and references, it looks good to me. Your references appear to be third-party, the format looks good, and there is quite a bit of information. I might suggest moving the references below the external links however, it's standard for the references to be at the bottom of the article. -- Crazysane (^T/_C\^D) 14:59, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look OK to me, apart from a few MoS issues which I'll try to iron out. When you "go live", the title should probably be Diversified Global Graphics Group — DG3, i.e. with an m-dash instead of the hyphen. Just to give you an idea of my penchant for pedantry. Favonian (talk) 15:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm closing out the helpme tag, seems like we've got a good start here, and this has been in the queue for an hour. -- Crazysane (^T/_C\^D) 15:41, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think we are done. I've done some polishing on the style and left a {{Citation needed}} tag on a statement that needs a reference. Other than that, I think it's ready for prime time. Favonian (talk) 16:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help everyone. I really appreciate the feedback. Backburnercomics (talk) 17:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

I wasn't sure if it was appropriate for me to make the designation in the WikiProject. Thanks for the good faith edit, Favonian. Backburnercomics (talk) 20:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries; it's a common mistake. Favonian (talk) 20:45, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Diversified Global Graphics Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]