Talk:DeviantArt

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the DeviantArt article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 3 months

DeviantArt was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 7, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
January 13, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
April 5, 2009	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet culture High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Websites: Computing High‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

This page is not a forum for general discussion about DeviantArt. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about DeviantArt at the Reference desk.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Why is "pornography" on the list of categories?

"Artworks are organized in a category structure, including photography, digital art, traditional art, literature, Flash, filmmaking, skins for applications, operating system customization utilities, pornography and others, along with downloadable resources such as tutorials and stock photography. Additional features include "journals", "polls", "groups" and "portfolios"."

Porn is actually not allowed on DeviantArt and posting such material can get you suspended or banned. It says so in the rules.

-Anonymous User — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.178.51.4 (talk) 13:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was made aware of this and I edited it out. This also serves as my WP:COI notification if my user page disclosure isn't enough: yes, I am a DeviantArt employee, and I normally don't edit articles where I have a conflict of interest unless I absolutely have to, which in this case is completely justified. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 00:36, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

People post porn to DeviantArt all the time though and they never get banned for it. 12.17.177.164 (talk) 19:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The mobile version of Deviantart was rated M, despite that it has Art made by "kids" and "teens", Unlike Swearing. I didn't even know why esrb looked at the art and said "Ok its filled with those Adult arts and your "basic" Fan arts" MissingWikia (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of DeviantArt Eclipse backlash or no?

The complete replacement of the old site layout with the Eclipse layout has received a continent-sized backlash, so it's no wonder a user keeps adding the bit about that to DeviantArt#Eclipse (Version 9). I keep removing it because of lack of reliable sources (and the user keeps adding it back in), but observations of the backlash (as a DeviantArt user) have made me ponder this choice. PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 20:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Highlighting this due to a recent edit war on this article. PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 00:43, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's certainly created a backlash, but you're right, it needs a legitimate citation to warrant a mention. Bkatcher (talk) 03:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Before I thought of checking the Talk page, I added a mention of the backlash with a reference link to dA's "Discover the New DeviantArt" newspost, where they proudly announced Eclipse was now the One True Way, and promptly received negative feedback for them to ignore (within a week there are 24k comments, most of which negative, for around 600 likes and 100k views). Medinoc (talk) 15:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:UGC, user reception and comments do not count, unless noted by a reliable source. PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 17:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So we need a "reliable source" that considers dA notable enough to report on? (and which will base its finding on that very same newspost and comments...) Medinoc (talk) 06:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia standards, to report such backlash, we need a reliable source, most likely a reputable news article, that reports the user backlash towards Eclipse. User comments do not count as reliable due to WP:UGC, and using them to cite your observations may run afoul of WP:NOR. You may disagree with these guidelines, but Wikipedia needs them to keep a high, encyclopedic standard.

(FYI, here's the Verge's article on Eclipse which has a small bit about user reception) ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 17:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I went here after seeing a video that touched on the 2019 backlash. Finding nothing here was disappointing. An event that affected a large number of users and reduced the number of users based on paywalled traffic analytic sites. I get a desire for high quality, but no mention of it at all is not high quality, sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin Lyda (talk • contribs) 05:32, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

DeviantArt screenshot 2022.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:08, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deviantart now allows sexually explicit artwork.

I'm not really a wikipedia editor, just a user of deviantart, but I noticed some outdated information and thought I'd mention it. Deviantarts policy around sexually explicit content has changed and it now allows illustrative content of that nature (no real life pornography though), with the requirement that it is behind one of Deviantarts many art paywall types. Either a subscription or a paid folder of some type. Citation 49 was updated and now states as such. There is also a journal here: https://www.deviantart.com/team/journal/An-Update-to-DeviantArt-s-Mature-Content-Policies-908472076 that details the changes, if anyone would like to read further into the date that this changed and why it changed. Hopefully someone will find a minute to update the content policy section, hope this information helped! 174.21.112.120 (talk) 22:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile version

i hid the article's =Mobile version= header because most of that section's content does not seem specific to the mobile version. i'm not taking the time right now to learn how to place an anchor so any links to that subsection keep working. Is there a way to use the What links here function to see what links to this (sub)section and not just what links to this page? --173.67.42.107 (talk) 03:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]