Talk:Democratic Party of Emilia-Romagna

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 December 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This page is not encyclopedic

This page is totally useless, a page for any regional section of a party is not permissible even in enwiki. If there is a real reason to maintain this page, please expose it, otherwise I will propose the deletion --Maremmano (talk) 22:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article deals with a leading regional section of the PD. This article is neither essential nor useless. I would keep it per consistency with similar articles: CDU Baden-Württemberg, SPD North Rhine-Westphalia, Scottish Labour Party, Scottish Conservative Party, Scottish Liberal Democrats, Scottish Labour, Scottish Conservative Party, Scottish Liberal Democrats, etc., not to mention the state/provincial sections of American/Canadian parties. --Checco (talk) 08:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Most of your examples can be acceptable, the scottish parties are national parties, in USA the two major parties change characteristics and ideologies in each state, instead there are no apparent reasons regarding the examples of German parties, and above all there is no valid reason to maintain this page. Soon I'll ask the deletion of this page --Maremmano (talk) 22:24, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree for the reasons cited above. I will thus remove the "proposed deletion" tag you recently added to the page (please note that the tag reads: "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason"; I object it). --Checco (talk) 09:48, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]