Talk:Acrostic ring

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

PROD removed

PROD concern stated as "Appears to only rely on one or two sources, checked and I couldn't find anything else". A quick Google Books search shows sources available from 1913 [1], 1971 [2], 1986 [3], 1998 [4], and 2015 [5]. I also find references in Australian newspapers from 1900 [6] and 1933 [7], and North American papers from eg 1899 [8], 1923 [9], 1936 [10], and 1968 [11]. RebeccaGreen (talk) 23:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose to merge Regards ring into Dearest ring. I think that the content in the Regards ring article can easily be explained in the context of Dearest ring, and the Dearest ring article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Regards ring will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. PepperBeast (talk) 17:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support the idea of a merge. I suggest the joint page title of Acrostic ring, with Dearest and Regards becoming sections. Klbrain (talk) 17:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 22:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]