Talk:Cutting in line

This article was nominated for deletion on July 23, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Ref and Weasel tags

I unserstand why these were added, but I don't think they should remain. The subject of this article has not been researched or documented to my knowledge, thus the information comes from consensus. However, in the case of this article, I don't think that detracts from the validity of the information, simply due to its universality. Would a reference be nice? Yes. Is it absolutely necessary? No. The weasel words used in this article are also permissible because it describes a social phenomenon, which are never completely predictable or defined. --Perimosocordiae 03:52, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno... there are plenty of resources on the Web to describe this cultural phenomenon. I'm currently looking into finding some good sources. --Brandon Dilbeck 00:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References are required for any article. If it hasn't been written (or spoken) about elsewhere, you can't write about it here. Material has to be verifiable, and everyone who contributes here should understand this. Richard001 (talk) 03:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't STAND when people say butting instead of budging

What's wrong with me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 (talk) 17:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In fact "butting" make more sense —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.50.2 (talk) 20:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with main article on queuing

This article is basically about the ethics of queuing, queue-jumping being a violation of queuing etiquette. There's been comment in the main article on queuing that it lacks a broader discussion of queuing ethics, so I suggest this article should be merged with the other. Gymnophoria (talk) 09:28, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Move it ASAP. And please use queue-jumping, as it's a clearer term internationally, whereas cutting is much more of an Americanism only. Suggest while you use Queue-Jumping as section header, make sure to explain Cutting-In, Cutting (in line), et al, as synonyms in the first sentence so there is less ambiguity among different users, making sure to also change the text to use queue-jumping instead of cutting accordingly. Jimthing (talk) 01:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cutting in line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cutting in line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150812035137/http://gothamist.com/2006/10/29/street_food_sta.php to http://gothamist.com/2006/10/29/street_food_sta.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]