Talk:Cross-community vote

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Northern Ireland

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Unionism in Ireland (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Unionism in Ireland, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Unionism in IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Unionism in IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Unionism in IrelandUnionism in Ireland articles

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An image is requested for this article as its inclusion will substantially increase the significance of the article. Please remove the `image-needed` parameter once the image is added.

Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.

Merged Designated Nationalist (history) → Cross-community vote
Merged Designated Other (history) → Cross-community vote
Merged Designated Unionist (history) → Cross-community vote

Also require a full assembly majority?

Does a cross-community vote require only a majority of unionist and a majority of nationalist votes, or does it also require a majority of the assembly taken as a whole? While it seems politically unlikely, there could be a vote in the current assembly that saw bare majorities of unionist and nationalist votes (28 and 23, respectively), plus no yes votes from the "other" group, which would garner only 51 yes votes out of 108 members. Would the bill pass? --Jfruh (talk) 21:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Cross-community vote. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Petition of Concern: more background information needed

Information on the PoC is sadly lacking from the article. It is very much in the news this week with the Johnson proposed alternative to the backstop being a "Stormont Lock" but commentators have noted that the PoC gives tbe DUP a de facto veto on any continuance of it. Could someone closer to the subject please write? I have added a couple of external links I found but both suffer from the "as you all know" syndrome. --Red King (talk) 16:26, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Party dates

What exactly is the point of the dates next to each party? It seems particularly odd to have dates before the existence of the current NI institutions, since the idea of a cross-community vote is a product of the Good Friday Agreement. --Jfruh (talk) 18:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Footnote 1 might be a clue: one party proposed to redesignate but never got that far. I can't see the point of this table now either, just three simple lists of status declared after the last election is adequate. (Though how would we know? Does the Assembly have to convene for designations to be recorded?) It is all a bit arcane but the Windsor Framework has thrust it into the floodlights, so we need to record it. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]