Talk:Conservation-dependent species

Extinction Mid‑importance

	This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fish

the orange roughy, in its article, states its condition as 'vulnerable'.which one is right, this page or that one?

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conservation Dependent → Conservation dependent
Critically Endangered → Critically endangered
Data Deficient → Data deficient
Extinct in the Wild → Extinct in the wild
Least Concern → Least concern
Near Threatened → Near threatened
Not Evaluated → Not evaluated

– These don't look like proper nouns to me, and looking through Google Scholar I would estimate they are capitalised only 50% of the time, if not less. Therefore these titles should be decapitalised per WP:CAPS: "Do not capitalize the second or subsequent words in a title, unless the title is a proper noun. For multiword page titles, one should leave the second and subsequent words in lowercase unless the title phrase is a proper noun that would always occur capitalized, even in the middle of a sentence." Jenks24 (talk) 17:55, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we should move them, as the terms the articles are about are the formal status names of the IUCN Red List and other lists, which are capitalised—not quite some general concepts. (With the exception of "extinct in the wild"). —innotata 18:54, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Innotata, those terms are defined by IUCN, and capitalized in IUCN documents as in the first form of each term above, except when they are given in all caps. I think that does make them proper nouns, as the names of specific categories. -- Donald Albury 19:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Innotata as well. We should not move these.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Donlammers (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Capitalisation of conservation statuses

Please see the ongoing discussion on Talk:Conservation status#Capitalisation of conservation statuses.
Coreyemotela (talk) 14:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]