Talk:Coming Persecutions
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 December 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Exegesis/Commentary
[edit]This article reads like an Exegesis, and a verse-for-verse commentary, rather than an encyclopedia article. Clinkophonist (talk)
I am suggesting that the tags be taken down. As for the fancruft tag, this passed an AfD debate, so I'd say it's secure on that point. The review/soapbox tag: this article does not meet any of the criteria on the wp:not/soapbox link. The layout tag: I utterly fail to see how this article fails the layout policy, but if specific suggestions are made, I'm open to working with them. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 05:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm removing them. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 20:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Coming Persecutions/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
*It presently contains too much detail of only passing notability for an encyclopedia.
|
Last edited at 02:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 12:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)