Talk:Combat Aviation Brigade, 10th Mountain Division/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
:: Spelling and grammer errors in the following section: Lead; Organization; , and red link problems throughout the article. Some of the layout is overlapping with the "edit" fuctions.- Fixed all of these issues. —Ed!(talk) 22:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
:: The following images: 150px and 150px don't have the permissions section filled in correctly. Without the permissions, these images could face deletion.- I think I have added the proper tags for the images now. —Ed!(talk) 22:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Good luck improving the article — Pr3st0n (talk) 23:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- I have responded to all of your concerns. Thank you for your review! —Ed!(talk) 22:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Good luck improving the article — Pr3st0n (talk) 23:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: