Talk:PaperofRecord.com

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I, the author, am not affiliated with the subjects of these articles. As a student and researcher, I have utilized these sources independently, and find that they are interesting and highly publicized and recognized. Please make specific suggestions as to how the articles can be improved. I welcome feedback and outside editing to improve the articles.

Also, can you point out where in the article there is a lack of neutrality, advertising, or unverifiable sources?

Mncline (talk) 23:49, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited it for WP:NPOV. Filing Flunky (talk) 16:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

missing history

Nothing at all on the controversy over its shutdown by Google in 2009, as detailed here [[1]] The incident started a debate over the longterm viability and preservation of digital archives, so is of some significance. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 20:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]