Talk:Rooster Bridge

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 March 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 January 2012. The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Slovenia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: , Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 37 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

I cast "expand"!

Okay, now the person who created all these little "start" articles can expand them. Go for it. - Denimadept (talk) 19:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name

I'm not enthusiastic about the English label "Petelin Bridge" because it feels unnatural. This would be like calling the Dragon Bridge "Zmaj Bridge", or Dog Peak "Pas Peak", or Kokošji hrib "Kokoš Hill." Doremo (talk) 12:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've found a new source calling the bridge Rooster Bridge.[1] Should the article be moved? Per WP:EN, "The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources" and WP:NATURAL: "If it exists, choose an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English". After all, which sources do actually call it 'Cock Bridge' in English? --Eleassar ^{my talk} 07:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree with the suggested move (and citing the source of the English name, of course). Both "Cock Bridge" and "Rooster Bridge" are equally acceptable (from the point of view of naturalness), but if we have a source for "Rooster Bridge" then that makes it preferable. Doremo (talk) 08:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]