Jump to content

Talk:Co-Cathedral of the Sacred Heart (Houston)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notable services.....

[edit]

Should Debakey's or other notable events be listed? Few other people would be notable enough to even mention, but I'm not sure. --Hourick (talk) 10:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

We have serious copyright violations on this article. What was presumed to be PD material claimed to be created by User:Vietboi26 is actually copyrighted material found at the locations that state "Copyright © 2006. All Rights Reserved. Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston 1700 San Jacinto, Houston, Texas 77002-8291.". I will remove and request deletion. Postoak (talk) 22:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


http://www.diogh.org/cocathedral/tour/floorplan.htm

  • Postoak, At one point User:Vietboi26 said the Archdiocese granted him permission to use all the information he has added on Wikipedia (much of the text was taken word-for-word from the Archdiocese's website, and I surmise the photos may have copyright issues as well, but first things first). I told him that if that was he case, he needed to obtain a copy of that "permission" in writing and submit it to wiki via email. I'm not sure as to whether or not anything was done to that effect, however if you look at the history of the Article (and his TALK) he has repeatedly removed the copyright notice template (as he did after your most recent edits -- to avoid 3rr, I did not restore them at this time)
  • I also suggested that he re-write several sections, so they weren't verbose from the Archdiocese's website (to try to help clear up the copyright questions) -- a task that he did undertake.
  • He has put forward a great amount of effort to expand the article, and I feel that most, if not all, of his edits have been done in good faith. I also think WP:BITE probably applies in this situation, so I have been a bit more lax is pushing the issue. --Nsaum75 (talk) 08:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I have additional concerns for the following images listed here with the original sources. It's OK to use flicker as long as the image is properly licensed. The flicker license is "Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic" by flickr user Onilad. Note that this license prevent commercial reuse. User:Vietboi26 uploaded these to Wikipedia as PD with the signature cropped from the image. Some of the images retain the original signature. Perhaps Onilad and User:Vietboi26 are one in the same, but if so why not just state so and release the images on flickr as public domain and properly source and classify the images on Wikipedia? These images are of dubious source and I will request to have them removed. If they are truly PD, then User:Vietboi26 should reclassify them as PD on flickr are then reupload them with an acceptable copyright tag, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Postoak (talk) 07:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Additional images found, not free or PD and by different photographer(s) at flickr. Speedy deletion requested. Postoak (talk) 08:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Copyrighted images, again

[edit]

This image [1] is copyrighted. I'm reverting the recent additions. Users cannot upload images to public domain when they belong to someone else. Postoak (talk) 01:07, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I should have read here first, but the images that *I* had uploaded were made by me. Fortunately I still have them on my computer...somewhere.--Hourick (talk) 18:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Vietboi and his sockpuppets were uploading a tremendous number of images that were either clearly non-free or had questionable copyright status'. He was also uploading copyrighted images on top of existing free images. I apologize if your photos were somehow deleted in the process. --nsaum75¡שיחת!‎ 20:37, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Only images that were uploaded by Vietboi were deleted. Hourick's images not touched, maybe they were removed from the article but still available. Postoak (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pipe Organ

[edit]

After the official organ dedication, we need to add something to the article about it. It's a $2.2MM instrument, so it's definitely worth mentioning. [2], [3], [4] -207.70.169.36 (talk) 15:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We Need a Better Image

[edit]

The picture for the Cathedral does not show how large it really is. The one below is much better. -- 24.215.246.114 (talk) 00:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-pVqE6kjCygg/T13d0UX-usI/AAAAAAAAJO8/RYoa6p1c8FQ/s400/houcath.jpg


Wikipedia can only use free images; the one you linked to is owned by the Archdiocese, and therefore cannot be used. -- nsaum75 !Dígame¡‎ 02:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Co-Cathedral of the Sacred Heart (Houston). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Co-Cathedral of the Sacred Heart (Houston). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Co-Cathedral_of_the_Sacred_Heart_(Houston)&oldid=1206727579"