This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 24 March 2014 by reviewer Mz7 (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
"better than Gmail's native app" ... "CloudMagic has received positive reviews" (so has every product ever released) ... "won the Webby Awards" ... "won ‘Best Design’ award at Evernote" (who is Evernote?) ... "one of the first apps to support Android Wear" ...
All that puffery, and there isn't a clear statement of what CloudMagic actually does.
Sayitclearly (talk) 06:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Couldn't agree more. These texts were written by or on behalf of the developer(s) and unworthy to appear on Wikipedia. It is no longer available as CloudMagic for iOs but has become a paid service ($49,95 a year) as Newton.
I suggest to let an independent author rewrite this whole lemma or else delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjot (talk • contribs) 04:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]