Jump to content

Talk:Clothing-optional bike ride

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sydney Body Art Ride

[edit]

Note: The Sydney Body Art Ride is not a clothing-optional bike ride, a minimum amount of clothiing is required. It is already correctly categorized under the Topfree category. Thanks. Dandelion1 18:35, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article assessment

[edit]

I'm a little surprised it falls under anyone's <<B>> criteria: it's mostly just a link farm with little prose. I give it a <<Start>> as it suggests some title headings with which to work but has very limited content. SeveroTC 18:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. Revising. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 13:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burning man 2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Burning man 2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Clothing-optional bike ride/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

* Too many links, not enough text.

Last edited at 13:09, 7 April 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 11:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clothing-optional bike ride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Needs more sources

[edit]

The article contains only one inline citation, which failed verification when I checked it. The article has been tagged accordingly. SunCrow (talk) 02:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]