Jump to content

Talk:Afghan Civil War (1992–1996)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Kabulin1996.png

[edit]

Image:Kabulin1996.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update November 2009

[edit]

In order to provide a better background of the conflict to many people, and more importantly to highlight the abuses of specific commanders, I've begun updating the article. As the article becomes large I am likely to move it to the "Seige of Kabul" article, as so far that is what most of the details have been based on. Admittingly much of the article is based on only 3 sources, the Afghanistan Justice Project, Human Rights watch's "Blood-stained hands" and Rashid's Descent into chaos. Those with access to other sources are highly encouraged to update accordingly.

Secondly I apologize for the large amount of dead wikilinks, but I intend to update those articles as well in the future, once again with the goal of highlighting particular abuses by particular commanders. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grant bud (talk • contribs) 11:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update on update

[edit]

I'm now reading "Taliban" and this has lots of background information on stuff other than Kabul, therefore I think I can probably start moving some of the stuff about the battle of Kabul out of this article and into the "Seiges of Kabul" which I'll probably change to "Battle of Kabul (1992-1996)" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grant bud (talk • contribs) 10:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Timeperiod wasn't anarchic

[edit]

The use of the word 'Anarchy' to describe this time-period is clearly a misuse, since although they may have been no central government during this time, it is neither to be assumed that there were no forms of hierarchy and rule nor is it indicated in the content of the page. Refer to Anarchy for clarification. 141.48.176.84 (talk) 12:06, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burhanuddin Rabbani addressing scholars-2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Burhanuddin Rabbani addressing scholars-2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Burhanuddin Rabbani addressing scholars-2.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POV

[edit]

I've recently tried correcting some of the related content about this war in other articles, mainly Taliban... this article is heavily POV and needs to be rewritten completely. This is a tedious task, I've tagged the article for the issue... but too much to fix at this time. To be specific, it is stating Pakistan's support for Taliban at multiple occasions as a fact which is clearly not a neutral POV. --lTopGunl (talk) 18:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The RFC for the Pakistani mainspace article hijacked by WP:Pakistan and dubious single purpose editors has no validity for an Afghanistan article. The uninvolved editors have made it clear in their comments that their statements were in consideration for the article in question: the country article Pakistan. But that the topic needed elaboration on other articles. In this article everything related to Pakistan's support to the Taliban has been attributed. I will remove the tags if you fail to address what exactly is your issue with the current version of this article. JCAla (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
All the editors on that talkpage are uninvolved in that dispute except 4-5 including us. About being hijacked... lol, ever heard about WP:AGF? Or even WP:DONTASSUME? Tell them on their talkpages (or at the discussion) that you think so, so that they are better informed. Consensus there is clear even to you and that will be closed in due time. But apart from that this is going to be in the scope of the mediation. I will discuss it there as formal mediation is a formal venue for this discussion, which makes these tags completely valid. --lTopGunl (talk) 04:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Civil war in Afghanistan (1989–92) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Afghan Civil War (1992–96). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Afghan Civil War (1992–96). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Afghan Civil War (1992–1996)

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Afghan Civil War (1992–1996)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Book_Anderson":

  • From Abdul Rasul Sayyaf: John Lee Anderson. The Lion's Grave (26 November 2002 ed.). Atlantic Books. p. 224. ISBN 1-84354-118-1.
  • From Afshar Operation: Anderson, John Lee. The Lion's Grave (November 26, 2002 ed.). Atlantic Books. p. 224. ISBN 1-84354-118-1.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Afghan_Civil_War_(1992–1996)&oldid=1216895211"