Talk:City of Joy

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

As per the book, the name of the colony was Anand Nagar. Anand means Joy. Not sure about name in the movie.Npindia 16:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Split

They should definitely be split off. The movie is horrible, and bears little resemblance to the book.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kdsnyder (talk • contribs) .

A check on IMDB confirms the film is based on the book (the article text wasn't quite clear on this). But I can't see that the film itself is noticable enough to justify its own article. I would have though a simple line such as "The 1992 film 'City of Joy' was loosely based on the book" would be enough. --Mark S (talk) 19:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It needs to be split, as the film bears enough fame and is distict enough from the book to be made into a new section.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]