Talk:1854 City of Auckland by-election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

New Zealand: Politics Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Auckland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

First ever by-election

Good on you for starting this article. Do you have a source for the claim that it was the first ever by-election? Nelson and Waimea also had by-elections that year, and they were both in June. But they might not have been contested - I don't know. Either way, they were still by-elections, and if they indeed weren't contested, then the text here should read that it was the "first ever by-election in New Zealand political history that was contested" or some such. What do you think? Schwede 66 18:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

@Hugo999: With this edit, you updated the page numbers for the Scholefield (1950) references. I rather doubted that those page numbers were all wrong and upon checking, I see that you have instead used the page numbers for the subsequent edition of the book edited by Wilson (1984). That's not ok. If you feel that the newer version needs to be used for referencing, you must do a proper job and also update the book reference itself. I shall fix it up. Schwede 66 19:24, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]