Talk:Camphora officinarum
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Naming conventions
[edit]Hmm ... I could have sworn that naming conventions on Wikipedia require words within article headings to be lower-case unless describing a proper name (e.g. place names, personal names). I'll check ... --Humehwy July 6, 2005 06:15 (UTC)
- I have moved this article back to its original "Camphor_laurel" title in accordance with Section 1.1 of the Wikipedia naming conventions. --Humehwy July 6, 2005 06:19 (UTC)
Noxious Weed Declaration
[edit]Does someone have a reference for the fact that the Camphor Laurel has been declared a noxious weed for the whole of NSW? It hasn't been declared a noxious weed over the whole of NSW (a Class 1 weed under the Noxious Weed Act 1993), and is only declared a Class 4 (Locally Controllable) in some councils in NSW - Parramatta City Council being an exception to this. (JROBBO 06:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC))
I checked the Hornsby Shire Council regulations (as at Apr 2007) and as long as the tree is under 20m tall it can be culled without council approval. No specific reference to the fact that is has been declared a noxious weed.
Object to move
[edit]I object to the move from common name Camphor Laurel to Cinnamomum camphora. This is against long-standing policy (i.e. when a well known common name exists, go with that for our title). No consensus was built in advance here, so please move it back. Badagnani 16:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Now it has a third name, but the article has several places still using the second. Jidanni (talk) 08:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
[edit]This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 15:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Any examples of using the plant as....
[edit]street trees...??? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A%20Camphor%20street%20tree&sa=N&tab=sw --222.64.222.141 (talk) 03:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Dangers
[edit]I am surprised that there is no mention of the dangers posed by this plant, especially in the section on Australia. In an environment already filled with plants that will ignite at the smallest spark, the camphor laurel doesn't just ignite it explodes and can easily turn a manageable bushfire into an emergency. 220.233.34.248 (talk) 02:47, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
"Hollows"?
[edit]In the article, it says "the tree provides hollows quickly in younger trees, whereas natives can take hundreds of years to develop hollows." I find this confusing. If by "hollows," it means "holes," why would that be a problem (or an advantage—it isn't clear which is meant)? Is there a localized definition of the word? — Gorthian (talk) 22:54, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Cinnamomum camphora. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140715042459/http://www.wondermondo.com/Countries/As/Japan/Kyushu/KamounoOhkusu.htm to http://www.wondermondo.com/Countries/As/Japan/Kyushu/KamounoOhkusu.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Oil vs. laurel
[edit]- Camphor laurel has six different chemical variants called chemotypes, which are camphor, linalool,
Don't you mean "Camphor oil" not "Camphor laurel"? Jidanni (talk) 08:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 27 December 2024
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Camphora officinarum be renamed and moved to Cinnamomum camphora. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Camphora officinarum → Cinnamomum camphora – There are many sources supporting the name Cinnamomum camphora. KOLANO12 3 10:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose PoWO lists Camphora officinarum as the senior synonym. WFO suggests there may be a change coming but it is currently in review, so WP:CRYSTAL may apply here. @Kolano123, you mention 'many' sources; would you care to list them. YorkshireExpat (talk) 12:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I find it odd that POWO is at odds with IPNI and WFO. @YorkshireExpat: you can see that the taxonbar has significantly more entries for the destination than for the source. I'm inclined to support the move, but I'm not there yet. @Plantdrew: Do you have thoughts here? - UtherSRG (talk) 18:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Waiting to see all the sources and have my mind changed. YorkshireExpat (talk) 18:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)