This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Employee of company and not authorized to speek for company. But, we can at least get the name right. Correct name of this page should be Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP
--Dwdockter (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
All three versions are used by reliable sources. Chevron Phillips is shorter, although it isn't used by the company and Chevron Phillips Chemical (with or without "Company") is probably more recognisable. Peter E. James (talk) 12:41, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The mentions of "Chevron Phillips" there include some followed by "Chemical Company" or "Chemical", others separated by a slash (where it isn't being used as a name) and several mentions of Chevron and Phillips together in a list. All variations of the name seem to be used equally often. Peter E. James (talk) 21:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Searching for "Chevron Phillips Chemical" gives 5,420 (books) and 913,000 (web). Using instead "Chevron Phillips" −"Chevron Phillips Chemical" (i.e. short form with no mention of long one) yields 3,090 and 495,000. Favonian (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – While not presuming the use of a laborious official name, Chevron Phillips Chemical helps identify that the subject is a only subsidiary merger, and of what nature, which both seem like importantly distinguishing aspects, while it is also not longer than usefully necessary. I suggest that it is thus a rational choice for common name. ENeville (talk) 03:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.