Jump to content

Talk:NASCAR playoffs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bias

[edit]

This article is very pro-Chase. It makes no mention of the argument that this type of forced competition is artificial, and unfair on drivers who dominate the first 2/3 of the season. It also gives an advantage to multiple-driver teams, who can use a car which is not in the Chase to manipulate the results in favour of its other cars. Wasn't there even a threatened boycott of the final races in 2004, by teams with no drivers in the Chase?--MartinUK (talk) 09:13, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think this should include a link to http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/2007_Chase_for_the_NEXTEL_Cup (and previous years), or perhaps some of the info should be combined.

12.206.162.49 16:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

–

"Some observers note, as a point out of comparison, that other major sports such as American football, baseball, provide no advantage to teams with superior win-loss records."

I don't understand what is being said here as teams in football and baseball *do* get the advantage through home field advantage in the playoffs, up until the Super Bowl or World Series anyway. Alex 12:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


There happen to be a lot of people who dislike the chase, so both side need to be clarified. --raganbaby_6 00:42, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Chase for the Cup despite Total Dominance?

[edit]

Would there be any point to Chase for the Cup if one driver is leading the points table pre-chase, but also wins the most races, grabs most podiums and top 5 finishes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TimHowardII (talk • contribs) 09:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Chase would still happen, and that dominant driver would most likely keep on dominating. But maybe he wouldn't. That's why they have the races. 75.76.213.106 (talk) 01:53, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comparisons of formats of the Chase

[edit]

I think the whole section titled "Comparisons of formats of the Chase" should be deleted. It is all speculation, under the changed rules the teams would have had different strategies, we see that now with the changes from 2013 to 2014. It's just added trivial data taking up space. Littlekelv (talk) 19:16, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely agree with this. It's OK to make general comparisons of the different systems but to list who would've won under old systems is just useless. The point is that they didn't win the championship in the system that mattered at the time. Intrepidusk (talk) 01:40, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. It is not encyclopedic-type content. I don't see the NFL pages saying "If OT wasn't sudden death then..." I am deleting. (talk) 08:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KD0710 (talk • contribs) [reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chase for the Sprint Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article changes

[edit]

Since the Chase was added for the each of the three national series, the article should be renamed (i.e. NASCAR Chase for the Championship or Chase for the Championship). The what-if statistics probably should removed or they will continue with the Xfinity Series and Camping World Truck Series. However, I'm pondering the idea of moving the article into NASCAR rules and regulations. Either way the article needs to be overhauled. Any other ideas on what should be done? – Nascar1996 (talk • cont) 00:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chase for the Sprint Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

[edit]

I suggest that this article be changed to "NASCAR Playoffs".Pja1981 (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:NASCAR_playoffs&oldid=1202568663"