Jump to content

Talk:Charles Payne (television personality)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://premierespeakers.com/charles_payne/bio. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Kendall-K1 (talk) 23:15, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given the problems with edit-warring and copyright violation, I've asked that the article be semi-protected. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:51, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I'm removing this section per WP:BLP. As it stands, it's sourced to a blog, which is not a WP:RS. There is also the SEC document, which was used as a source at one time, but it doesn't support what the text in the article says. If someone wants to put this back in, please cite a reliable source. Kendall-K1 (talk) 00:46, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - I was thinking the same thing. Such material can only be justified if it has had significant coverage in mainstream reliable sources. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed another section per BLP, sourced only to a copyvio video on YouTube. BencherliteTalk 01:27, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm starting to think this article should go to AFD. Two of the remaining sources are primary ones related to the subject of the article, the other is his bio at Fox. I couldn't find any evidence of notability in an admitedly very short search. Kendall-K1 (talk) 03:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Charles Payne (journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Payne (journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]