Talk:Carlton Gardens

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Melbourne Low‑importance

	Australia portal Carlton Gardens is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

This article needs work. Somebody needs to go back to more substantial secondary sources for the history, such as Georgina Whitehead's Civilising the City: A history of Melbourne's Public Gardens. The City of Melbourne marketing department's information and the citations for Heritage Victoria and the World Heritage listing are derived mainly from these, often through a series of 'chinese whispers' that result in a hash of facts. Their claims are also hyperbolic at times, e.g. the 'botanical significance' of the quite limited range of species in the Carlton Gardens is risible. There are many fine trees, it is a fine landscape, but it is not a significant botanical collection. I have made a few obvious corrections but there is more that should be done. R Jones 22:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There certainly seems to be a lot of history missing. I lived opposite the gardens in Carlton Street in the late 60s and early 70s and things I remember that are not yet covered are: maternal & child health centre that used to be where museum now is; traffic school where playground now is, including a shallow, empty, round 'lake' with a sort of metal stepped bridge-like structure in the centre; metal pipe playground equipment, including swings, a see-saw and a roundabout; a poorly-designed 70s-style treated pine and tan bark playground constructed next to the lake during the time I lived there; and annual outdoor art exhibitions held where the garden show is now held. Zoe Ocean 23:07, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

– Carlton Gardens, Melbourne is a World Heritage site while the other uses are a barely notable primary school with a name derived from the World Heritage site and a cul-de-sac in the UK without its own article. Mattinbgn (talk) 21:49, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support The World Heritage gardens is clearly the primary topic.--Melburnian (talk) 00:04, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carlton Gardens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]