Talk:Call Me Joe
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Astounding Apr 57.jpg
[edit]Image:Astounding Apr 57.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Avatar a film version?
[edit]Given the similarities, can Avatar be regarded as a film version of Call Me Joe? If some people (who?) have called for Anderson to be given credit for Avatar, does that imply Cameron knew of Call Me Joe?
The similarities are so great, and the basic idea so unusual, that I don't see how Cameron could not have read Call Me Joe.Nigelrg (talk) 04:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Call Me Joe. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.sfreviews.net/darkbetween.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Start-Class Transhumanism articles
- Low-importance Transhumanism articles
- Start-Class novel articles
- Low-importance novel articles
- Start-Class Short story task force articles
- Unknown-importance Short story task force articles
- Start-Class Science fiction novels articles
- Unknown-importance Science fiction novels articles
- WikiProject Novels articles