Talk:C++11
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the C++11 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 60 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from C++0x was copied or moved into Concepts (C++) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Incorrect example for regular expression.
[edit]It seems to be incorrect.
Fixed. 2022 Dec 9 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basilmozzarella (talk • contribs) 01:07, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
References to C++03 language
[edit]I disagree with the comparisons to a "C++03" language in the article. AFAIK there has never been such a thing, and no compiler have ever supported a C++03 version of C++. They have supported C++98 until the switched to the next version of the core language C++11. There was no changes to the language itself in between, only errata to the C++98 standard.Carewolf (talk) 13:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Then what is this: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=38110 which is titled ISO/IEC 14882:2003 Programming languages -- C++? Do they publish an entirely new standards document just to handle errata?
— franl | talk ✤ 17:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Pseudorandom number generation looks incorrect
[edit]uniform_real_distribution is misleading. It links to a general discussion of uniform distributions, in which x is generated as a <= x <= b. But the C++ implementation provides a <= x < b, which is more in line with what programmers expect. This sent me searching for another (nonexistent) option in C++ to provide < b. I didn't change the page but I think someone may want to check this out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.32.192.41 (talk) 15:24, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
global std::begin and std::end not described
[edit]https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/iterator/begin - since C++11 (accompanied with std::cbegin and std::cend in C++14) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asashnov (talk • contribs) 15:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)