Talk:Bytemark

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Bytemark is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

reference 5 for BigV

WRT reference 5 for BigV, it's probably worth linking directly to the Design And Implementation pdf linked in the article, and mentioning that it's KVM now, not UML, which drives Bytemark's virtualisation. Regularfry (talk) 13:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declaring an interest

Hello - I'm currently employed at Bytemark^[1]. I'm going to restrict my edits on this page to pure factual edits at best, or otherwise suggest them here.

Please help me out by letting me know (gently!) if I contravene best practice or whether there's any factual information that I can supply. I've reviewed all the guidance in this area and I've been a Wikipedia editor for around a decade on-and-off, so I hope to be useful rather than a shill. Technicalfault (talk) 14:48, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.bytemark.co.uk/company/team

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bytemark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.bytemark.co.uk/company/team

[1]