Jump to content

Talk:Burns, Oregon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

USCITY guideline

[edit]

Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for section order. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 07:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation

[edit]

Anybody think we ought to add more recreation links? --Ç 22:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. See WP:NOT. Katr67 17:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments for GAN

[edit]

Congrats on the current state of the article, Finetooth. You should not encounter any major problems at GAN. I made a few minor edits, which we are welcome to discuss, and of course you are welcome to revert or change. The only other things I noticed was the 2010 census information was displayed before 2000 census details, which to me reads a bit funny. Plus 2000 comes before 2010 in the census table, so there is a bit of inconsistency here. Also, I mean no offense to Burns, but what is the culture like? The Paiute information is important, but are there any annual festivals, stats on political ideology, etc.? Just curious if you came across any information in your research. Again, great work! --Another Believer (Talk) 01:32, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to review this. Your point about the census is good and reminds me of my general doubts about the robo-insertion of two sets of demographic stats in city articles. I think it is relatively boring stuff to read and that using more than the most recent set puts too much emphasis on demographics. Do you think it would be OK to simply delete the 2000 census details, leaving only the 2010? Meanwhile, I will look for more cultural data and possibly voting patterns. These are both good ideas. Finetooth (talk) 02:06, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The more I thought about it, the more convinced I became that using two similar sets was overkill. I deleted the 2000 data except for the income data. I will see if I can find the income data for 2010 in the census archives. Finetooth (talk) 03:38, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. The margins of error on the income stats for 2010 look enormous. I think I should leave the 2000 income stats at the bottom of the revised Demographics section after all. Finetooth (talk) 03:59, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps just note any major changes between 2000 and 2010? --Another Believer (Talk) 15:14, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Figured it all out, I think. Then moved on to the cultural events. I had not discovered the Portland Youth Philharmonic (PYP) connection before taking your advice about cultural data. Very good advice. Birds, 4-H, and hammered dulcimers are part of the story too. If you think of anything else, my ears are open. Finetooth (talk) 17:16, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Great additions to the article. Most often when I am reading about cities on Wikipedia, I am searching for things to do, cultural activity, landmarks, history, etc. What is living in X City like? Well done! --Another Believer (Talk) 20:07, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Burns, Oregon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gilderien (talk · contribs) 11:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Initial thoughts

[edit]
  • Can you confirm that where a citation appears at the end of a paragraph, it covers the material covered therein?
Reply: Yes. I generally use only one if it covers everything in the paragraph, but I use two or more if each covers only some of the claims in the paragraph. If you see any claims that you think need a citation in closer proximity, let me know, and I'll revise. Finetooth (talk) 17:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does "Euro-American" refer to new european settlers to america or people of european ethnicity who moved westwards?
Reply: Broadly speaking, they were U.S. citizens who moved westwards. It seems likely to me that a few individuals of various backgrounds and ethnicities came from elsewhere, but I have nothing to support that idea. Finetooth (talk) 17:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Prose is fine
  • No copyvio found

--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 20:27, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the rest of the criteria and since my computer restarted last time I wrote it all out, I shall just say it passes as a Good Article.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 19:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your kind attention. Thank you for taking the time and trouble to review the article. Finetooth (talk) 22:19, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bundy militia's demand(s)

[edit]

Regarding our article about the Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge please consider commenting at that article's talk page on the question "Should we say anything more about Public Lands Privatization and demand feds cede ownership?"NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 10:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NewsAndEventsGuy: Does this have anything to do with improving this article about Burns, Oregon? Otherwise, I'd caution you to make sure you're not WP:CANVASSING and say that the best way to get input is to drop a note at WT:ORE as WikiProject Oregon members are probably the only ones who closely watch this page, despite recent events. Valfontis (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I'm not saying you're in violation of the canvassing guidelines, as I have not looked closely, but you definitely seem to be spamming. Cheers, Valfontis (talk) 18:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
For those playing along at WP:ANI or my talk page, by "spamming" I meant Wikipedia:Canvassing#Spamming and excessive cross-posting, not WP:SPAM. Valfontis (talk) 23:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OH... at ANI I thought you said something else, but that's fine. Thanks for pointing this specific provision out. I can make a case for how each page is related to the demands to cede ownership of federal lands, so in my judgment "excessive" was not what I was doing. But others disagree so I can live with that. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 00:27, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads up, I know the rule well. Canvassing only occurs when you are trying to solicit people to agree with you. In contrast, there are lots of places in our guidelines that encourage leaving pointers of this sort so that other eds - even formidable debaters who disagree - will be alerted to the thread and invited to join. For example, see the first bullet point at.... well, at the canvassing rule, under the section appropriate notice. As for spamming, ironically I sent to several pages covering a wide spectrum specifically to avoid the appearance of canvassing. Thanks for your attention. I'm sure Burns enthusiasts will be glad when it is resolved NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:11, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Burns, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Burns, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Burns, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burns, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Burns,_Oregon&oldid=1213057606"