Talk:Bravo (Saudi Arabia)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Saudi Arabia

	Saudi Arabia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Copyright concerns

This page appears to be a copyright violation. The first three paragraphs are lifted almost verbatim from http://commercecan.ic.gc.ca/scdt/bizmap/interface2.nsf/vDownload/ISA_5107/$file/X_2663005.DOC. Although this is a U.S. government publication, and U.S. government works are normally ineligible for copyright, this document appears to fall under the exemption for works of standard reference data produced by the Secretary of Commerce (15 U.S.C. § 290e). Indeed, the document explicitly asserts copyright ("International copyright, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2006. All rights reserved outside of the United States"). Consequently, this Wikipedia article does appear to violate copyright. The last two sentences may not violate copyright but lack context in the absence of the material that precede them (and are extremely poorly written). —Caesura ^(t) 18:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-written the article from a neutral perspective as close as possible to Wiki's articles guideline with original wording using the same Company article template, I've requested a copy of the company's Logo from the company itself.

Sincerely

Basem —Preceding comment was added at 09:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I initially reported the copyright problem to Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2007 November 27/Articles, so I'll retract that report now. Thanks. —Caesura ^(t) 03:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Highjacked

I stumbled upon this series of edits in 2015 by BT.team which apparently highjacked an article about a Saudi telecom company, replacing it by an article about a (probably) non-notable Canadian one. Not sure what should be done but I can at least leave my thoughts here and tag the article appropriately. Perhaps the revisions for the Canadian topic should be histsplit into its own and deleted or draftified and this title be restored to the prehighjacked version? Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 21:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]