Jump to content

Talk:Brahumdagh Bugti

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Brahamdagh Khan Bugti)

File:Brahumdagh bugti.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Brahumdagh bugti.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recent sourced content removal

[edit]

Please do not remove sourced content from the article repeatedly, before discussion here first. this constitutes edit warring -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 18:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page title

[edit]

AbdulBugti moved this page from Brahamdagh Khan Bugti' to Brahumdagh Bugti [1], saying that the original was misspelled. However, the reliable sources use the former spelling, e.g.,

or on Google Books [2]. So, I think the page should be renamed back. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mar4d: do you have a view on this? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:51, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I did a little search on this, and it appears Brahumdagh himself spells his name that way. So I guess we may as well stick with that. Mar4d (talk) 05:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brahumdagh Bugti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Previous Vandalism

[edit]

I've just realized that numerous edits were made prior to my own which removed large chunks of relevant, cited content on Brahmadagh Bugti. I'm going to proceed to undo some of these changes and return the article to its previous status. Von oberstein (talk) 01:56, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]

Over the past couple of days there has been persistent edit warring occurring on this article, including the appearance of whitewashing. I've protected the page for 3 days in order to drive the individuals involved to this talk page to discuss concerns and desired changes. Please use it to determine consensus.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 June 2020

[edit]

Early Life - Brahumdagh Bugti was born in 1980, October 25th. He has one wife, Shumaila Bugti, along with three children. He is from Raheja Bugti Tribe. During the last days of his life, Nawab Akbar Bugti named Nawak Brahumdagh Bugti as his next heir and chief of the bugti tribe.

The fact that Brahumdagh Bugti abducted a UN Official is false and entirely wrong. Instead, the person was abducted but not by him. It was just false accusations to prevent Switzerland from accepting his citizenship and yet, the succeeded with this blame. He ran to Switzerland to seek safe passage from Pakistan Killing him after they killed his grandfather, Nawab Akbar Bugti. He self-exiled himself to seek for the rights of his people still getting killed and tortured by Pakistani Forces. Please add these correct changes to the page. There are also 'references' articles about his struggle through these hardships.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.118.83.10 (talkcontribs)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Content discussion

[edit]

How should we start the discussion of reviewing each other's edits and point out which ones are reliable and which one should we agree on adding on the page. Get back to me Asap. Mohammad Jan Bugti (talk) 13:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:CONTENTDISPUTE (and its subset WP:SEEKHELP). As I noted on your talk page however, if you intend to simply insist that the reliably sourced content is some sort of conspiracy, you will unlikely find consensus for the changes you wish to make.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:06, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I've added a section header to separate your question from the edit request made in June above.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]