Talk:Brătianu-class river monitor
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brătianu-class river monitor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Eligible for speedy deletion: article created by a blocked editor: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_IP_editor. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:59, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Umm...no. Okay? No! I can take you, deleting some minor ships that I could not find any real sources for. I can take you deleting some minor battles that can be more or less cobbled with other articles. But deleting the very first warships assembled in Romania, the ships that kickstarted a naval industry that 2 years ago built what is currently the largest warship of the German Navy, is where I draw the line! No man! These ships have genuine historical importance! These ships are unique and fought in both World Wars! The fact that I am blocked doesn't change any of that! The fact that I am blocked doesn't render any information less notable, or any source less accurate. Commissioned warships are considered notable. Stop destroying my work just because it was specifically me who did it! I did it because likes like you, who think that only the Great Powers form the world, couldn't be bothered to do it! but if you really want to delete this, then at least copy the article, and create it back yourself! That's the right thing to do! Why lose historically valuable information, because I have a different status? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.123.126.231 (talk) 11:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)