Talk:Boss (2013 Hindi film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

A fact from Boss (2013 Hindi film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 October 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the upcoming film Boss will mark actor Ronit Roy's first role as an antagonist and second consecutive one as that of a police officer after Shootout at Wadala?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Boss (2013 Hindi film).

Wikipedia

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Revertion of edits, reasoning

Multiple issues:

No source for multiple statements like Audience reception, names, trailer and teaser release dates etc.
Youtube video hits are not kept track of because they are subject to change please state how they have a meaningful impact on the article.

Please provide references for your edits. Sohambanerjee1998 13:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 17 October 2013

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add:

Rajeev Masand of IBN LIVE gave the film 1.5 stars out of 5 citing " Neither original, nor entertaining, this Boss deserves to be fired!"

183.87.193.20 (talk) 12:54, 17 October 2013 (UTC) http://www.weirdangles.com/2013/07/boss-2013-reviews-trailer-images-news.html[reply]

Done. I've cited the IBN Live page itself, since the Weird Angles one doesn't have that quote. Thanks. --Stfg (talk) 14:20, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undone The article's critical reception section suffers from close paraphrasing problem. Adding one line reviews which are more about the reviewers personal liking of the film is unnecessary since it lacks the fundamental thing to provide critical analysis of technical things like direction, cinematography, flaws not their personal opinion. Plus you have to add it in your own word otherwise its a copy-vio. Minimal use of quotes within " " is acceptable but lifting is not. Sohambanerjee1998 15:31, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Sohambanerjee1998: You have misunderstood the close paraphrasing guideline. Please see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing#Quotation of non-free text, which states: "Limited quotation from non-free copyrighted sources is allowed, as discussed in Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline. Quotations should have in-text attribution and should be cited to their original source or author (see WP:When to cite)." The material added, which you removed, was directly quoted, was given in-text attribution, and was sourced to the original. Please also be aware that accusations of copyright violation are serious and should be made only with careful attention to the facts. There was no copyright violation in that addition. It is quite usual to quote respected critics in Critical reception sections. Please undo you reversion. --Stfg (talk) 09:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Stfg: I agree with you, there is nothing wrong in adding one-line quotes but technically in does no justice to the section critical reception. The critics word Neither original, nor entertaining, this Boss deserves to be fired! is just a personal opinion about his liking of the film, if a film making aspect mentioned in the review was added I would have made no objection. In the end I would like to apologize if my words affected anyone's sentiments, as one can see at the top I have pledged to extend my limits just for the betterment of the article and would die rather than not to abide by it. Stfg as you can see I have contributed to the article a lot and a DYK so I plan to add critical reception, a summary of the reviews in own word with minimal quotes but being a student I have very little time so please be kind enough to give me that time so that I can work hard enough to make the article a

. Being a member of Wikipedia:Neutrality cabal and following the policy WP:NPOV I have always adhered to being neutral and unbiased and adding this review would be a classic example of the above mentioned policies so I would definitely add them. Thanks. If anyone in meantime adds it please add it in the manner displayed Fight Club (film)#Critical reception i.e. in own words Id be more than happy to see it. Best, --Sohambanerjee1998 09:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Sohambanerjee1998: Thanks. I am happy to leave it to you to rewrite the section in your own words. That's fine. Of course, all comments by critics are personal opinions; all WP:NPOV requires us to do is to ensure that we represent the spectrum of critical opinion fairly. Please do take care with accusations of copyvio. I actually have a strong record of reporting copyvio and have both successfully proposed a CCI and contributed to it. Believe me, there is no copyvio in that section. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 10:13, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Stfg:, yes if it had been earlier I too thought that there are no copy-vio's but some time ago I requested an article to reassessed at WP:FILM, the reviewer, User:Betty logan declined the article a B -class and retained it as a start. When I queried her about the reason for the declination she pointed out that the critical reception was full of copy-vio's. The article - Special 26. Sohambanerjee1998 10:19, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. I may be able to help. --Stfg (talk) 10:40, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 21 October 2013

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Boss Total 6 Days Box Office Collection Report 202.142.118.156 (talk) 07:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Unreliable source. Sohambanerjee1998 08:33, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Boss (2013 Hindi film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]