This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:46, December 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot20:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
@AustralianRupert: I think that the article should now meet the B-class criteria, and as always it's been great working with you here. I'd suggest the following priorities for further development:
More coverage of the decision making that led to this campaign, and especially the Balikpapan landing (which was opposed by much of the Australian Government and military at the time)
Some background on the harsh conditions endured by local civilians during the Japanese occupation
More detail on the air and naval operations
A section on the guerrilla warfare which accompanied the conventional operations. This should probably note the allegations that Australian soldiers allowed the guerrillas to commit war crimes (something Ooi notes but argues probably didn't occur).
More detail on how historians view the campaign (the current view seems to be that the Brunei operation was probably justified, Tarakan probably wasn't and Balikpapan was a significant mistake)
@Nick-D: G'day, Nick, is there anything else you think needs to be added to the article now, and would you be keen to take this to GAN? Also, if you have some time, would you mind taking a look at the Balikpapan article and letting me know if you think there is anything glaring missing from it? Thanks for your time. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:36, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to add an extra para on the guerrilla warfare to turn this into a separate sub-section. I'll try to do this today, and will also look in on the Balikpapan article. Nick-D (talk) 23:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Nick, I note we both have other articles at GAn, so if you are happy with waiting, I will hold off on nominating this for GAn until maybe later in the week (next Friday maybe). Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 01:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
